What should an occupational MCU report include for a Permenaker-aligned review?

For a Permenaker-aligned review, structure the occupational medical check-up report so an authorized reviewer can trace the conclusion back to evidence. Record the worker and employer or project scope, examination date and type, relevant role or exposure context, examinations performed, source findings with units and reference ranges, missing or conflicting information, the doctor's conclusion, any work restriction or follow-up, final sign-off, and version or audit history. The exact template should follow the institution's approved occupational-health process and the examinations applicable to the work.

Keep three regulatory subjects distinct. PER-02/MEN/1980 addresses worker health examinations and occupational safety. PER.01/MEN/1981 addresses the duty to report occupational diseases. KEP.333/MEN/1989 addresses diagnosis and reporting of occupational diseases. These sources are related but not interchangeable. A routine MCU report should not silently serve as an occupational-disease notification. When an occupational disease is suspected or diagnosed, the institution should route the case into its separate clinical, employer, and regulatory process and confirm the required form and timing.

MCU CoPilot can organize mapped findings and prepare a proposed report for doctor review. The institution still owns the examination scope, template, occupational-health rules, doctor assignment, sign-off, and any separate filing. Before release, the responsible occupational physician and legal or compliance team should validate the template against the current rules and the institution's actual work setting. AI writes. Doctors decide.