Severity Level (INA-CBGs)
INA-CBGs severity levels I, II, and III describe increasing clinical complexity: no complication or comorbidity, minor, and major. A level must be supported by documented secondary diagnoses; missing or inaccurate documentation can place a case in the wrong tariff group.
Reviewed documentation for the claim team
Micromeet is not the BPJS, VClaim or E-Klaim login or helpdesk; use your institution’s official support. Care Workspace can support reviewed documentation for coding and casemix teams. Claim readiness describes that workflow, not a separate product or guaranteed claim acceptance.
Read the full explanationCare Workspace’s reviewed clinical context can give authorized coding and claim teams a traceable documentation starting point. Claim Readiness focuses on source completeness and human review, not automated submission or payer approval.
Read the full explanationClinicians confirm the clinical record; authorized institutional staff own coding and submission. Payer teams own adjudication, with each local payer path verified separately rather than assumed to work across markets.
Read the full explanationSeverity is therefore won or lost in the clinical note: comorbidities have to be captured and coded to support the level. From the Claim Readiness payer-workflow perspective, this begins with purpose-limited, institution-approved patient context and clinician-reviewed documentation. Authorized institutional clinicians and coders own the documented facts, coding, and submission, while the payer system owns adjudication.